💎 Diamond Anvils — Types, Geometries & Selection 
§1 — Why diamond as an anvil?
Diamond has a unique combination of properties that makes it the only viable material for an anvil able to exceed 100 GPa: maximum hardness (Vickers ~10,000 HV), an exceptional bulk modulus (K0 ≈ 446 GPa [Occelli et al. 2003]), and an unmatched electromagnetic transmission window — from the UV (~225 nm) to the far-IR (~300 μm), with only a two-phonon absorption band between 1800 and 2500 cm−1. In practice, two opposing anvils form a sample chamber a few tens of microns across, compressed by the culets. The maximum attainable pressure is set by the culet diameter, the bevel geometry and the diamond quality [O’Bannon et al. 2018, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89:111501].

§2 — Cut geometries
Four culet profiles cover most experimental needs. See the SVG schematics below.
Standard / Modified Brilliant Cut (MBC): 16-facet modified brilliant cut, 3.75 mm stone diameter, flat culet 100–600 μm, (100) orientation. General use <100 GPa. Typical supplier: Almax easyLab [almax-easylab.com].
Boehler-Almax (BA): 70° or 80° conical profile, 2.50–3.10 mm diameter, enlarged X-ray aperture (up to 80° half-angle). De facto standard for synchrotron diffraction [almax-easylab.com/BA; Boehler & De Hantsetters 2004].
Single & double bevel: inner culet 20–100 μm, 8–10° bevel out to 300–350 μm. Routinely exceeds 200 GPa, up to ~400 GPa with a double bevel [O’Bannon 2018].
Toroidal (t-DAC): toroidal groove FIB-milled around a 9–30 μm central culet. The groove traps gasket material and supports the anvil, reproducibly reaching 4–6 Mbar [Jenei et al. 2018, Nat. Commun.; Dewaele et al. 2018, Nat. Commun.].

§3 — Diamond types: classification and properties
Diamond anvils are classified by their impurity content [Diamond type classification; Almax easyLab FAQ]:
Type Ia: ~98% of natural production. Aggregated nitrogen (IaA, IaB >100 ppm). Strong IR absorption between 1000 and 1450 cm−1 (N impurities) and in the far-IR. Moderate visible fluorescence. Use: Raman, XRD, high pressure. Above 2700 cm−1 the transmission is better than type IIa.
Type Ib: ~0.1% of natural diamond, dominant for industrial HPHT synthetics. Dispersed atomic nitrogen (~100 ppm), yellow colour. Marked IR absorption at 1344 cm−1 (synthetic indicator).
Type IIa: ~2% of natural diamond, <1 ppm N. Transparent from 225 nm to ~300 μm except the two-phonon band. Very low fluorescence. Reference for IR and Raman in the DAC. Ultra-low birefringence available [Crystran].
Type IIas (synthetic HPHT): synthesised at 5–6 GPa / 1300–1600°C. <1 ppm N, reproducible IIa optical quality, excellent uniformity. Available in large sizes (up to 5×5 mm). Ultra-low Raman fluorescence [Almax FAQ].
Type IIac (synthetic CVD): chemical-vapour deposited. Excellent for IR (lower far-IR absorption than natural IIa). High Raman fluorescence (avoid for Raman). Recommended for IR spectroscopy and XRD at high pressure [Almax FAQ].

§4 — Nano-polycrystalline diamond (NPD) — Ehime University / GRC
NPD is synthesised by direct conversion of graphite at high pressure and temperature (15 GPa, 2300–2500°C) in the 6000-tonne BOTCHAN-6000 multi-anvil press at the Geodynamics Research Center (GRC), Ehime University, Japan [Ishimatsu et al. 2012, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19:768; Nakamoto et al. 2011, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82:066104].
Distinctive properties:
• Randomly oriented grains a few tens of nanometres in size → no cleavage plane, no hardness anisotropy
• Higher hardness than single crystal for culets >300 μm (attainable pressure 1.5 to 2× higher)
• Optically transparent (comparable to type Ib), usable for IR and spectroscopy
• No Bragg glitches in X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS/XANES): the signal is no longer perturbed by single-crystal diffraction peaks
NPD is available on request from the GRC for partnership experiments, and sold in Japan by Sumitomo Electric (SUMICRYSTAL/SUMIDIA).

§5 — Culet and maximum pressure: the empirical law
O’Bannon et al. (2018) compiled the full literature dataset (flat, bevel, double bevel) and fitted a Pmax(dculet) relation [doi:10.1063/1.5049720]. Key results:
See the interactive chart below. Above ~300 GPa, conventional bevel geometries must give way to toroidal anvils (t-DAC) or double-stage systems (ds-DAC) using NPD or NCD as the second stage.
Typical parameters for ~400 GPa: 20 μm culet, 8.5° bevel, bevel/culet diameter ratio = 14–18.

§6 — Selection by experimental technique
The diamond type to choose depends on the technique:
Raman: Type Ia (low fluorescence) or IIas (ultra-low). Avoid IIac (CVD fluorescence too high at 532 nm).
IR (FTIR) >2700 cm−1: Type Ia acceptable (better transmission than IIa above 2700 cm−1 [Haas & Daniels 1983, Appl. Spectrosc. 37:284]).
IR (<1200 cm−1, far-IR): Type IIa or IIac essential (Type Ia absorbs strongly <1200 cm−1 through nitrogen).
Synchrotron XRD: Type Ia (Boehler-Almax) or IIas. NPD is ideal for XANES (no glitches).
UV (<225 nm): Type IIa only (Ia absorbs below 250 nm). Type IIa transmits down to ~225 nm.
Very high pressure (>200 GPa): IIas HPHT or NPD for increased strength.
Anvil geometry — to-scale schematics
conical WC support X = 50–100° ØT 1.69–3.34 Ø 2.50–4.00 mm (girdle) Ht 1.40–1.95 H 0.57–0.80 culet (active face) chamfer 0.025×45° Htc 15–37° (back cone) Conical anvil — Boehler cut · 16 facets · [100] plane axial cross-section, to scale · Type IIac / CVD · general tol. ±0.025 mm / ±0.15°
Exact dimensions (Boehler cut, [100] plane, 16 facets): BETSA conical anvil list (PDF) — design: Boehler & De Hantsetters 2004, High Press. Res. 24:391
Ø (mm)X apertureØT (mm)H (mm)Ht (mm)Htc
2,5050°1,690,701,9537°
3,1070°2,290,701,7225°
3,3070°2,380,801,7020°
3,3085°2,500,691,4415°
4,0080°3,190,701,9525°
4,00100°3,340,571,4015°
General tolerance ±0.025 mm / ±0.15° · chamfer 0.025/45° · Z 0.30 mm · material Type IIac or CVD. The culet (active face) and the aperture are chosen to suit the experiment.
Culet profiles — comparison
Flat (MBC)single flat culetØ culet 100–600 µm · <100 GPa Single bevel1 bevel angleβ≈8°culet 20–100 µm · >200 GPa Double beveltwo slopes (double pente)β₁β₂β₁ inner + β₂ outer (3–10°) · ~400 GPa Toroidalcentral culet + FIB groovetoroidal groovecentral culet 9–30 µm · 4–6 Mbar
Flat <100 GPa · bevel >200 GPa · double bevel ~400 GPa · toroidal 4–6 Mbar [O’Bannon 2018 ; Jenei 2018]
Maximum pressure vs culet diameter — hover over the chart
Show:
Source: O'Bannon et al. 2018, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89:111501 + Jenei 2018 + Dewaele 2018 + Zurkowski 2024. Log scale. Data: flat/bevel/double-bevel/toroidal/NPD.
Comparative infrared transmission (2 mm) — interactive cursor
Show:
Zoom:
Sources: Haas & Daniels 1983CrystranIR spectrosc. DAC review 2012FAQ Almax easyLab. Modelled curves (analytical model calibrated on published data: N peaks at 1175/1282/1365 cm−1, two-phonon band 1800–2700 cm−1).
Diamond types — selection table
Type Nitrogen (N) Synthesis IR transp. Raman fluor. UV <250 nm Recommended DAC use
Ia>100 ppm (aggreg.)Natural (98%)Cutoff <1450 cm−1Low–moderateNoRaman, XRD, general use. MIR>2700 cm−1 ok.
Ib~100 ppm (atomic)HPHT industrialAbs. 1344 cm−1HighNoNot recommended for scientific DAC
IIa<1 ppmNatural (2%)ExcellentVery lowYes >225 nmReference IR, Raman, UV-vis, XRD
IIas HPHT<1 ppmHPHT synth.ExcellentUltra-lowYesBest overall choice. Very high pressure, IR, Raman, XRD
IIac CVD<1 ppmCVD synth.Excellent far-IRHigh @532 nmYesIR (FTIR), XRD. Avoid for Raman
NPD (Irifune)n/aHPHT graphiteGood (Ib-like)ModeratePartialXANES (no glitches), >300 GPa, large culets
📚 References
Geometries & maximum pressure
O’Bannon et al. (2018) — Culet diameter & max pressure. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89:111501
Boehler & De Hantsetters (2004) — Conical design (Boehler-Almax). High Press. Res. 24:391
Jenei et al. (2018) — Toroidal DAC >5 Mbar. Nat. Commun.
Dewaele et al. (2018) — Toroidal DAC to 603 GPa. Nat. Commun.
Ding et al. (2023) — Frontier in DAC techniques (ds-DAC, t-DAC, >1 TPa). J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 35

Nano-polycrystalline diamond (NPD)
Ishimatsu et al. (2012) — NPD anvils, glitch-free XANES. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19:768
Nakamoto et al. (2011) — NPD micro-paired double stage. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82:066104

IR transmission & diamond types
Haas & Daniels (1983) — Type Ia vs IIa IR transmission. Appl. Spectrosc. 37:284
Kataoka et al. (2022) — IR absorption coeff. type IIa (400–4000 cm−1). MDPI Chemosensors

General DAC reviews
Jayaraman (1983) — Diamond anvil cell & high-pressure investigations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 55:65 — foundational reference
Yue et al. (2024) — In situ measurements with LH-DAC: comprehensive review. Phys. Status Solidi RRL
Burnley, SERC/NAGT (2011) — DAC educational resource: components, techniques, applications

Anvil selection & specifications
Almax easyLab — How to select your diamond anvil — official guide (type, size, fluorescence, birefringence)
Almax easyLab — Boehler-Almax anvils — aperture 30°–120°, RULF fluorescence selection
BETSA — Conical anvil list (dimensions) — conical geometry, [100] plane, Type IIac/CVD
GRC — Ehime University — NPD synthesis (Irifune group)
Occelli, Loubeyre & LeToullec (2003) — Diamond properties under pressure, K0 = 446 GPa. Nat. Mater. 2:151
Crystran — Diamond optical properties — UV/IR transmission, IIa and CVD